Kuro5hin just posted an interesting article listing 50 “fishy circumstances, contradictory claims, and videotape anomalies.”
When I first got a full, uncorrupted file, I thought it was Windows Media and the poor encoding that caused many of the technical issues with the video (e.g. out of sync audio, blurriness, and timeline skipping), but this seems to be more due to the production of the video.
Here are my thoughts about the points the article makes.
Suspicious Circumstances and Timeline
None of these points are especially compelling to me. Iraq is a war zone where tensions are high, information is more difficult to confirm, and people can disappear or get lost. The only thing that really interests me is why was Berg traveling alone? That seems especially strange. Points 4 and 10 are completely irrelevant.
Timing of Killing and Videotape Release
It seems to me that the timing on this isn’t completely suspicious. Surely if the timing was more suspect, the media could easily confirm and report this fact. It isn’t. Also, remember that the prisoner abuse is not new news. It’s been known since January, so it seems plausible that the existence of the photos may have been known by the terrorists. Point 13 is definitely true; it did come at a convenient point in time. Point 14 seems to be irrelevant unless somebody wants to construct a very paranoid conspiracy involving the President.
Videotape of Berg, His Decapitation, and Location
This section simultaneously makes the best and the worst points. Points 14, 21, and 22 have zero compelling value. Orange jumpsuits, chairs, and yellowish walls probably aren’t very uncommon to come by in Iraq. It doesn’t take much imagination to construct a plausible explanation of how Berg got to be in an orange jumpsuit (e.g. “they found one in a dumpster behind a prison”). All the points about Berg possibly being dead before the decapitation seem to be true in my opinion. Berg does not struggle at all it seems during the video even when the screaming starts. I’d say Berg was either heavily drugged or dead before his head was cut off. But, I’d disagree with point 19. I’ve been hunting, and I’ve seen animals butchered right before my eyes. It’s not that hard to get a clean cut especially when you have something as thin as a human neck and you can follow the base of the skull.
More Videotape Anomalies
Many of these points are verifibly true, but also they don’t seem to give warrant to any suspicion. Maybe the bastards who did the decapitation just had poor equipment and didn’t really know what they were doing. So what if there is a gap in the timestamp? Maybe that just means they took a long time to decide what to do. The poorly dubbed in screams (which I originally thought to be just caused by the poor file/encoding quality) does reinforce the theory that Berg was already dead.
Identity of Killers of Berg and Their Possessions
Many of these points, if determined to be true, would definitely throw a wrench in the current interpretation of the video. One point that could be made here is that if the audio of the speech was dubbed in it seems plausible that Al-Zarqawi is still alive, recorded the speech, but had somebody else stand in for him when shooting the video. Remember the CIA only identified him by speech analysis. If the voice is not Al-Zarqawi then the CIA is either completely wrong or lying to us, neither of which I’d accept unless given much more evidence. The question then would be why would they make an effort to make us think the speaker was indeed speaking? Points 37 and 45 have no compelling value at all because, once again, it is very easy to construct a plausible explanation for each point. Also, point 44 shows that the author isn’t very in touch with what the terrorist demographic is in Iraq. Hardly any of them are Iraqis because most are from Iran, Syria, or other Arab countries.
Berg’s Activities and Return of the Body
Point 46 is uncanny but also seems to be a dead end. The other points are interesting, but not very compelling. Why did Berg travel at night? Maybe he hated the heat of the day.
Considered as a whole, these points might be compelling enough for some people to construct dark conspiracy theories, but, like I said at the beginning, Iraq isn’t exactly a bastion of order and most likely abounds in strange circumstances that could explain many things about the video. The only thing I’m pretty much convinced about is that Berg was probably dead or heavily drugged before having his head cut off. If this is true, it lessens the impact of the video to some degree, but the point is still made: whoever did this (and I still believe it is terrorists) are barbarians who need to be dealt with as barbarians.